2014, ഏപ്രിൽ 18, വെള്ളിയാഴ്‌ച

Portsmouth’s first gay wedding brings brides to tears

Lauren and Mitzi Barber were the first couple in Portsmouth to have a gay marriage, Picture: Carla Stillman

Lauren and Mitzi Barber were the first couple in Portsmouth to have a gay marriage, Picture: Carla Stillman
  • by Ben Fishwick
BURSTING into tears Mitzi Barber could not contain herself as she watched her wife-to-be walk down the aisle.
The 22-year-old and her now wife Lauren, 19, both of Copnor Road, Portsmouth, had waited a year for their big day.
And it was made even more happy as their union was the first same-sex marriage in the city.
Mitzi, who proposed to Lauren last March, said: ‘When she walked down the aisle I couldn’t even talk. I was crying, I made everybody in the whole room cry.
‘She looked absolutely beautiful and we couldn’t have asked for a better day.’
Lauren, who works at a nursery, added: ‘When we booked our wedding we were just expecting it to be a civil partnership.
‘We love the fact that we can say we are married just the same as a different-sexed couple can.
‘It is exactly the same, there is no difference.’
And the reaction from gathered friends and family at the Royal Beach Hotel in Southsea, couldn’t have been better.
The registrar announced the pair were the first to marry in the city, with the families cheering.
Mitzi, a community carer, said: ‘People were standing up, clapping and cheering for us. It was amazing.’
The couple used to play football for Widbrook and got together when they went on a tour to Spain in July 2011.
But not everything has gone to plan for the happy couple.
Mitzi couldn’t wait to pop the question and ended up abandoning plans for a romantic proposal, instead doing it while they were having a Chinese takeaway.
Lauren said: ‘We’d booked to go to visit the Royal Beach Hotel before we were engaged.
‘Mitzi had been telling me she planned to get a ring – it’s something that we’d talked about a lot.
‘It was a Friday, she got the ring and she actually told me – she shouldn’t have done.
‘We went out for drinks that Friday evening and I said ‘I want my ring.’
‘We’d come back from the pub and we were eating a Chinese – she ran upstairs, came down, got down on one knee and got the ring out.
‘She’d planned for us to go to a hotel and have the house decorated and do it nice and romantic.
‘It didn’t work out that way but it doesn’t matter. Obviously, I said yes.’
The pair were married on April 5. Same-sex marriage became legal in England on March 29.

Portsmouth’s first gay wedding brings brides to tears

Lauren and Mitzi Barber were the first couple in Portsmouth to have a gay marriage, Picture: Carla Stillman

Lauren and Mitzi Barber were the first couple in Portsmouth to have a gay marriage, Picture: Carla Stillman
  • by Ben Fishwick
BURSTING into tears Mitzi Barber could not contain herself as she watched her wife-to-be walk down the aisle.
The 22-year-old and her now wife Lauren, 19, both of Copnor Road, Portsmouth, had waited a year for their big day.
And it was made even more happy as their union was the first same-sex marriage in the city.
Mitzi, who proposed to Lauren last March, said: ‘When she walked down the aisle I couldn’t even talk. I was crying, I made everybody in the whole room cry.
‘She looked absolutely beautiful and we couldn’t have asked for a better day.’
Lauren, who works at a nursery, added: ‘When we booked our wedding we were just expecting it to be a civil partnership.
‘We love the fact that we can say we are married just the same as a different-sexed couple can.
‘It is exactly the same, there is no difference.’
And the reaction from gathered friends and family at the Royal Beach Hotel in Southsea, couldn’t have been better.
The registrar announced the pair were the first to marry in the city, with the families cheering.
Mitzi, a community carer, said: ‘People were standing up, clapping and cheering for us. It was amazing.’
The couple used to play football for Widbrook and got together when they went on a tour to Spain in July 2011.
But not everything has gone to plan for the happy couple.
Mitzi couldn’t wait to pop the question and ended up abandoning plans for a romantic proposal, instead doing it while they were having a Chinese takeaway.
Lauren said: ‘We’d booked to go to visit the Royal Beach Hotel before we were engaged.
‘Mitzi had been telling me she planned to get a ring – it’s something that we’d talked about a lot.
‘It was a Friday, she got the ring and she actually told me – she shouldn’t have done.
‘We went out for drinks that Friday evening and I said ‘I want my ring.’
‘We’d come back from the pub and we were eating a Chinese – she ran upstairs, came down, got down on one knee and got the ring out.
‘She’d planned for us to go to a hotel and have the house decorated and do it nice and romantic.
‘It didn’t work out that way but it doesn’t matter. Obviously, I said yes.’
The pair were married on April 5. Same-sex marriage became legal in England on March 29.

Killer teenager’s bid for shorter jail term is denied

A BOY who brutally murdered a father-of-one has been told he must serve every day of his sentence after a failed appeal.
Alex Farrelly, now 21, was 15 when he and drinking pal Benjamin Vine savagely attacked Bill Wickham, 44, in a churchyard in Gosport in February 2008.
Now Farrelly’s bid to have his sentence reduced a second time has been rejected at the Royal Courts of Justice.
As reported in The News, dyslexic 6ft 5in thug Farrelly had been drinking with Vine, then 16, before they stamped and kicked Mr Wickham to death.
Community leaders in Gosport have today backed the court’s decision.
At the time Gosport borough councillor Peter Edgar said the attacks ‘shocked’ the people of Gosport.
He said: ‘I was horrified by the case. I think the court is quite right.
‘It weakens the power of the law if you let people out before they’ve served their sentence.
‘It’s dangerous to shorten that sentence, whatever circumstances there are in prison. This was a particularly tragic case. It upset a whole community.’
Christie Coulston, 68, was a church officer at the time of the murder.
He said: ‘He should serve his sentence. They gave him that sentence.
‘I remember coming over [to the church] the next morning and finding the whole place sealed off.
‘There was utter shock. Everybody was quite quiet.
‘He was mentioned in our services, a few prayers were said. No-one deserves to be beaten to death.’
The Rev Andy Davis had just come to lead the church at Holy Trinity when Farrelly and Vine murdered Mr Wickham, and he carried out the trawlerman’s funeral.
He said: ‘It was just shocking to have that in church grounds, which should be a place of peace and tranquillity.’
Mr Wickham’s family maintain a memorial to him in the grounds.
In court Farrelly’s lawyers argued he has made ‘exceptional progress’ and wanted his sentence further reduced.
They said his efforts to turn his life around, including achieving a B grade in a maths GCSE, justified a cut in jail time. But Mr Justice Sweeney disagreed.
He said while his behaviour in custody was good, it was not ‘exceptional’.
‘There can be no doubt that the applicant has made progress whilst in custody,’ he said.
‘As compared to the 15-year-old who murdered Mr Wickham, he has matured significantly, his disciplinary record is exemplary and he has completed courses and obtained vocational and educational qualifications.
‘He also has a strong support network via his family and family friends.
‘However, the tariff assessment reports do not suggest that his progress has been exceptional.
‘It is in my view self-evident that the progress that he has made, although clearly commendable, has not been exceptional. Whilst Farrelly is to be congratulated for the progress that he has made, I do not recommend that his tariff should be reduced.’
Farrelly and Vine were sentenced to 12 years in September 2008 for the murder but Farrelly’s term was reduced to 10 years on appeal in 2009.
Farrelly can be freed when he has served his minimum term, but only if the Parole Board is convinced he is no longer a danger to the public.
Farrelly and Vine were a deadly pair when together
KILLER Alex Farrelly was blighted in early life with learning difficulties and extreme dyslexia.
The thug had an extremely low IQ and did not fit in at school, often getting into trouble.
He was abusive towards staff and fellow pupils and together with Benjamin Vine he picked on younger pupils.
In January 2007 the pair assaulted a 14-year-old school pupil outside the gates and threatened staff.
The pair later attacked another pupil and were convicted of battery. Then in August 2007, months before the murder of Bill Wickham, they attacked a man on the street.
Farrelly admitted the murder of Mr Wickham at Winchester Crown Court in 2008. When asked why he had attacked Mr Wickham, Farrelly said: ‘Just drunk, dunno.’
Attackers left prints of shoes on victim
ASKING two teenagers for a cigarette, Bill Wickham could never have known they were about to kill him.
The 44-year-old trawlerman spoke to the Alex Farrelly and Benjamin Vine as they had been drinking in Holy Trinity Church, in Gosport, at 10.15pm on February 25 in 2008.
The pair smashed a bottle over his head before kicking and stamping on him with such force they left imprints of the soles of their shoes on his head and neck.
Their trainers and clothes were left covered in his blood as a result of the brutal beating. The two yobs rifled through his pockets for cash and fled the scene leaving a trail of bloodied footprints.
They left him in a pool of blood fighting for his life.
Mr Wickham, of South Street, Gosport, suffered horrific head and neck injuries during the attack and by the time emergency services arrived at the scene he had died from his wounds.
Just minutes after the attack the youths called 999 and told police they were witnesses.
Police treated the teenagers as witnesses but soon realised they were dealing with Mr Wickham’s attackers.
Forensic tests on their clothes and shoes showed they were covered in Mr Wickham’s blood. Shoe prints found on Mr Wickham’s body matched the soles of their shoes, and bloodied shoe prints close to the murder scene also matched their trainers.
Police said the attack was ‘vicious and sustained’.

Killer teenager’s bid for shorter jail term is denied

A BOY who brutally murdered a father-of-one has been told he must serve every day of his sentence after a failed appeal.
Alex Farrelly, now 21, was 15 when he and drinking pal Benjamin Vine savagely attacked Bill Wickham, 44, in a churchyard in Gosport in February 2008.
Now Farrelly’s bid to have his sentence reduced a second time has been rejected at the Royal Courts of Justice.
As reported in The News, dyslexic 6ft 5in thug Farrelly had been drinking with Vine, then 16, before they stamped and kicked Mr Wickham to death.
Community leaders in Gosport have today backed the court’s decision.
At the time Gosport borough councillor Peter Edgar said the attacks ‘shocked’ the people of Gosport.
He said: ‘I was horrified by the case. I think the court is quite right.
‘It weakens the power of the law if you let people out before they’ve served their sentence.
‘It’s dangerous to shorten that sentence, whatever circumstances there are in prison. This was a particularly tragic case. It upset a whole community.’
Christie Coulston, 68, was a church officer at the time of the murder.
He said: ‘He should serve his sentence. They gave him that sentence.
‘I remember coming over [to the church] the next morning and finding the whole place sealed off.
‘There was utter shock. Everybody was quite quiet.
‘He was mentioned in our services, a few prayers were said. No-one deserves to be beaten to death.’
The Rev Andy Davis had just come to lead the church at Holy Trinity when Farrelly and Vine murdered Mr Wickham, and he carried out the trawlerman’s funeral.
He said: ‘It was just shocking to have that in church grounds, which should be a place of peace and tranquillity.’
Mr Wickham’s family maintain a memorial to him in the grounds.
In court Farrelly’s lawyers argued he has made ‘exceptional progress’ and wanted his sentence further reduced.
They said his efforts to turn his life around, including achieving a B grade in a maths GCSE, justified a cut in jail time. But Mr Justice Sweeney disagreed.
He said while his behaviour in custody was good, it was not ‘exceptional’.
‘There can be no doubt that the applicant has made progress whilst in custody,’ he said.
‘As compared to the 15-year-old who murdered Mr Wickham, he has matured significantly, his disciplinary record is exemplary and he has completed courses and obtained vocational and educational qualifications.
‘He also has a strong support network via his family and family friends.
‘However, the tariff assessment reports do not suggest that his progress has been exceptional.
‘It is in my view self-evident that the progress that he has made, although clearly commendable, has not been exceptional. Whilst Farrelly is to be congratulated for the progress that he has made, I do not recommend that his tariff should be reduced.’
Farrelly and Vine were sentenced to 12 years in September 2008 for the murder but Farrelly’s term was reduced to 10 years on appeal in 2009.
Farrelly can be freed when he has served his minimum term, but only if the Parole Board is convinced he is no longer a danger to the public.
Farrelly and Vine were a deadly pair when together
KILLER Alex Farrelly was blighted in early life with learning difficulties and extreme dyslexia.
The thug had an extremely low IQ and did not fit in at school, often getting into trouble.
He was abusive towards staff and fellow pupils and together with Benjamin Vine he picked on younger pupils.
In January 2007 the pair assaulted a 14-year-old school pupil outside the gates and threatened staff.
The pair later attacked another pupil and were convicted of battery. Then in August 2007, months before the murder of Bill Wickham, they attacked a man on the street.
Farrelly admitted the murder of Mr Wickham at Winchester Crown Court in 2008. When asked why he had attacked Mr Wickham, Farrelly said: ‘Just drunk, dunno.’
Attackers left prints of shoes on victim
ASKING two teenagers for a cigarette, Bill Wickham could never have known they were about to kill him.
The 44-year-old trawlerman spoke to the Alex Farrelly and Benjamin Vine as they had been drinking in Holy Trinity Church, in Gosport, at 10.15pm on February 25 in 2008.
The pair smashed a bottle over his head before kicking and stamping on him with such force they left imprints of the soles of their shoes on his head and neck.
Their trainers and clothes were left covered in his blood as a result of the brutal beating. The two yobs rifled through his pockets for cash and fled the scene leaving a trail of bloodied footprints.
They left him in a pool of blood fighting for his life.
Mr Wickham, of South Street, Gosport, suffered horrific head and neck injuries during the attack and by the time emergency services arrived at the scene he had died from his wounds.
Just minutes after the attack the youths called 999 and told police they were witnesses.
Police treated the teenagers as witnesses but soon realised they were dealing with Mr Wickham’s attackers.
Forensic tests on their clothes and shoes showed they were covered in Mr Wickham’s blood. Shoe prints found on Mr Wickham’s body matched the soles of their shoes, and bloodied shoe prints close to the murder scene also matched their trainers.
Police said the attack was ‘vicious and sustained’.

Japan to arm remote western island, risking more China tension

Japan's Defence Minister Onodera uses a pair of binoculars during an annual new year military exercise by the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force 1st Airborne Brigade in Funabashi
Credit: Issei Kato / Reuters/Reuters
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan is sending 100 soldiers and radar to its westernmost outpost, a tropical island off Taiwan, in a deployment that risks angering China with ties between Asia's biggest economies already hurt by a dispute over nearby islands they both claim.
Japanese Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera will break ground on Saturday for a military lookout station on Yonaguni, which is home to 1,500 people and just 150 km (93 miles) from the disputed Japanese-held islands claimed by China.
The mini-militarization of Yonaguni - now defended by two police officers - is part of a longstanding plan to improve defense and surveillance in Japan's far-flung frontier.
Building the radar base on the island, which is much closer to China than to Japan's main islands, could extend Japanese monitoring to the Chinese mainland and track Chinese ships and aircraft circling the disputed crags, called the Senkaku by Japan and the Diaoyu by China.
"We decided to deploy a Ground Self-Defense Force unit on Yonaguni Island as a part of our effort to strengthen the surveillance over the southwestern region," Onodera said this week. "We are staunchly determined to protect Yonaguni Island, a part of the precious Japanese territory."
The 30 sq km (11 sq mile) backwater - known for strong rice liquor, cattle, sugar cane and scuba diving - may seem an unlikely place for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to put boots on the ground.
But Yonaguni marks the confluence of the Japanese defense establishment's concerns about the vulnerability of the country's thousands of islands and the perceived threat from China.
The new base "should give Japan the ability to expand surveillance to near the Chinese mainland," said Heigo Sato, a professor at Takushoku University and a former researcher at the Defense Ministry's National Institute for Defense Studies.
"It will allow early warning of missiles and supplement the monitoring of Chinese military movements."
Japan does not specify an enemy when discussing its strategy to defend its remote islands. But it makes no secret that it perceives China generally as a threat - a giant flexing its growing muscle and becoming an Asian military power to rival Japan's ally, the United States, in the region.
Japan, in National Defense Programme Guidelines issued in December, expressed "great concern" over China's rapid military buildup, opaque security goals, its "attempts to change the status quo by coercion" in the sea and air, and such "dangerous activities" as last year's announcement of an air-defense identification zone.
FORWARD STRATEGY
Japan's remote-island strategy, set out in the guidelines, is to "intercept and defeat any invasion by securing maritime supremacy and air superiority" with swift deployments supplementing troops positioned in advance.
"Should any remote islands be invaded, Japan will recapture them. In doing so, any ballistic missile or cruise missile attacks will be dealt with appropriately."
Yonaguni, at the western tip of Japan's 3,300-km (2,000-mile) southwestern island chain, is practically within sight of the disputed rocks that are the feared flashpoint of Japan's island strategy, which could draw the United States into a fight.
Onodera's groundbreaking ceremony comes four days before President Barack Obama lands in Tokyo for a summit with Abe, the first state visit by a U.S. president in 18 years.
Japanese and Chinese navy and coastguard ships have played high-stakes cat and mouse around the disputed islets since Japan nationalized the formerly privately owned territory in September 2012. Japanese fighter jets scrambled against Chinese planes a record 415 times in the year through to March, up 36 percent from the previous year, the Defense Ministry said last week.
Tapping such concerns, Abe raised military spending last fiscal year for the first time in 11 years.
He is bolstering Japan's capability to fight for islands with a new marine unit, more longer-range aircraft, amphibious assault vehicles and helicopter carriers. Although the country's landmass is smaller than California, its thousands of islands give it nearly 30,000 km (18,600 miles) of coastline to defend.
Tight fiscal constraints, however, mean Japan can't keep pace with China's yearly double-digit military budget increases.
WARY WELCOME
The people of Yonaguni, where Abe wants to station 100 troops and perhaps as many family members within two years, have mixed feelings about their imminent role in facing off against China.
"Opinion is split down the middle," Tetsuo Funamichi, the head of the island's branch of the Japan Agricultural Association, said by telephone. "It's good for the economy if they come, but some people worry that we could be attacked in an emergency."
Takenori Komine, who works in an island government office, said it was a risk worth taking if it meant reviving an outpost of Japan that has been in decline since a brief postwar boom.
At that time, U.S.-occupied Yonaguni's proximity to Taiwan made it an entry point into Japan for smuggled food and clothing from Hong Kong. Since the end of World War Two, the island's population has withered by some 90 percent. Average income of about $22,500 a year is a fifth below the national average.
"We are hopeful that the arrival of the young troops will bolster local consumption," Komine said.
But Yonaguni's mainstays, beef and sugarcane, are in the crosshairs of trade negotiations. Abe is trying to defend Japan's high tariffs on them but has recently agreed to beef tariff cuts for Australia and is under strong pressure to do the same for the United States before Obama's visit, as part of broad talks on an ambitious Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade pact.
"If the TPP includes sugar, this island is finished," said Funamichi of the agricultural co-op.
And a sharply falling population on Yonaguni would have security implications, a government official said.
"It's not good from the perspective of securing our territory," said the official in Tokyo. "If people don't live there, you could lose your claim to effective control." ($1 = 102.2750 yen)
(Writing by Tim Kelly; Editing by William Mallard)

Japan to arm remote western island, risking more China tension

Japan's Defence Minister Onodera uses a pair of binoculars during an annual new year military exercise by the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force 1st Airborne Brigade in Funabashi
Credit: Issei Kato / Reuters/Reuters
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan is sending 100 soldiers and radar to its westernmost outpost, a tropical island off Taiwan, in a deployment that risks angering China with ties between Asia's biggest economies already hurt by a dispute over nearby islands they both claim.
Japanese Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera will break ground on Saturday for a military lookout station on Yonaguni, which is home to 1,500 people and just 150 km (93 miles) from the disputed Japanese-held islands claimed by China.
The mini-militarization of Yonaguni - now defended by two police officers - is part of a longstanding plan to improve defense and surveillance in Japan's far-flung frontier.
Building the radar base on the island, which is much closer to China than to Japan's main islands, could extend Japanese monitoring to the Chinese mainland and track Chinese ships and aircraft circling the disputed crags, called the Senkaku by Japan and the Diaoyu by China.
"We decided to deploy a Ground Self-Defense Force unit on Yonaguni Island as a part of our effort to strengthen the surveillance over the southwestern region," Onodera said this week. "We are staunchly determined to protect Yonaguni Island, a part of the precious Japanese territory."
The 30 sq km (11 sq mile) backwater - known for strong rice liquor, cattle, sugar cane and scuba diving - may seem an unlikely place for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to put boots on the ground.
But Yonaguni marks the confluence of the Japanese defense establishment's concerns about the vulnerability of the country's thousands of islands and the perceived threat from China.
The new base "should give Japan the ability to expand surveillance to near the Chinese mainland," said Heigo Sato, a professor at Takushoku University and a former researcher at the Defense Ministry's National Institute for Defense Studies.
"It will allow early warning of missiles and supplement the monitoring of Chinese military movements."
Japan does not specify an enemy when discussing its strategy to defend its remote islands. But it makes no secret that it perceives China generally as a threat - a giant flexing its growing muscle and becoming an Asian military power to rival Japan's ally, the United States, in the region.
Japan, in National Defense Programme Guidelines issued in December, expressed "great concern" over China's rapid military buildup, opaque security goals, its "attempts to change the status quo by coercion" in the sea and air, and such "dangerous activities" as last year's announcement of an air-defense identification zone.
FORWARD STRATEGY
Japan's remote-island strategy, set out in the guidelines, is to "intercept and defeat any invasion by securing maritime supremacy and air superiority" with swift deployments supplementing troops positioned in advance.
"Should any remote islands be invaded, Japan will recapture them. In doing so, any ballistic missile or cruise missile attacks will be dealt with appropriately."
Yonaguni, at the western tip of Japan's 3,300-km (2,000-mile) southwestern island chain, is practically within sight of the disputed rocks that are the feared flashpoint of Japan's island strategy, which could draw the United States into a fight.
Onodera's groundbreaking ceremony comes four days before President Barack Obama lands in Tokyo for a summit with Abe, the first state visit by a U.S. president in 18 years.
Japanese and Chinese navy and coastguard ships have played high-stakes cat and mouse around the disputed islets since Japan nationalized the formerly privately owned territory in September 2012. Japanese fighter jets scrambled against Chinese planes a record 415 times in the year through to March, up 36 percent from the previous year, the Defense Ministry said last week.
Tapping such concerns, Abe raised military spending last fiscal year for the first time in 11 years.
He is bolstering Japan's capability to fight for islands with a new marine unit, more longer-range aircraft, amphibious assault vehicles and helicopter carriers. Although the country's landmass is smaller than California, its thousands of islands give it nearly 30,000 km (18,600 miles) of coastline to defend.
Tight fiscal constraints, however, mean Japan can't keep pace with China's yearly double-digit military budget increases.
WARY WELCOME
The people of Yonaguni, where Abe wants to station 100 troops and perhaps as many family members within two years, have mixed feelings about their imminent role in facing off against China.
"Opinion is split down the middle," Tetsuo Funamichi, the head of the island's branch of the Japan Agricultural Association, said by telephone. "It's good for the economy if they come, but some people worry that we could be attacked in an emergency."
Takenori Komine, who works in an island government office, said it was a risk worth taking if it meant reviving an outpost of Japan that has been in decline since a brief postwar boom.
At that time, U.S.-occupied Yonaguni's proximity to Taiwan made it an entry point into Japan for smuggled food and clothing from Hong Kong. Since the end of World War Two, the island's population has withered by some 90 percent. Average income of about $22,500 a year is a fifth below the national average.
"We are hopeful that the arrival of the young troops will bolster local consumption," Komine said.
But Yonaguni's mainstays, beef and sugarcane, are in the crosshairs of trade negotiations. Abe is trying to defend Japan's high tariffs on them but has recently agreed to beef tariff cuts for Australia and is under strong pressure to do the same for the United States before Obama's visit, as part of broad talks on an ambitious Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade pact.
"If the TPP includes sugar, this island is finished," said Funamichi of the agricultural co-op.
And a sharply falling population on Yonaguni would have security implications, a government official said.
"It's not good from the perspective of securing our territory," said the official in Tokyo. "If people don't live there, you could lose your claim to effective control." ($1 = 102.2750 yen)
(Writing by Tim Kelly; Editing by William Mallard)

Tunisian envoy kidnapped in Libya

TRIPOLI: A Tunisian diplomat was kidnapped on Thursday in Tripoli in unknown circumstances, a Libyan security source told AFP, just two days after armed men seized Jordan’s ambassador.

A Tunisian source confirmed the abduction and identified the diplomat as Al-Aroussi Al-Fatnassi, without giving further details.

Tunis’s ambassador to Libya, Ridha Boukadi, refused to comment. Libyan foreign ministry spokesman Said Lessoued said he could not confirm nor deny the reported abduction, the latest in a string of incidents targeting foreign diplomats and Libyan politicians.

A Tripoli police official, quoted by Al-Wassat news website, however said the diplomat was seized by unknown assailants near the central Al-Kadissiya square not far from the Tunisian embassy. If confirmed, the diplomat would be the second staffer from the Tunisian embassy abducted in the Libyan capital since March 21 when a man employed by the mission was seized. His fate is still unknown.


Tunisian envoy kidnapped in Libya

TRIPOLI: A Tunisian diplomat was kidnapped on Thursday in Tripoli in unknown circumstances, a Libyan security source told AFP, just two days after armed men seized Jordan’s ambassador.

A Tunisian source confirmed the abduction and identified the diplomat as Al-Aroussi Al-Fatnassi, without giving further details.

Tunis’s ambassador to Libya, Ridha Boukadi, refused to comment. Libyan foreign ministry spokesman Said Lessoued said he could not confirm nor deny the reported abduction, the latest in a string of incidents targeting foreign diplomats and Libyan politicians.

A Tripoli police official, quoted by Al-Wassat news website, however said the diplomat was seized by unknown assailants near the central Al-Kadissiya square not far from the Tunisian embassy. If confirmed, the diplomat would be the second staffer from the Tunisian embassy abducted in the Libyan capital since March 21 when a man employed by the mission was seized. His fate is still unknown.


Saudi spy chief ousted under US pressure

The exit of Saudi’s spy chief was the result of US pressure over his stance on Syria but does not signal a shift in Riyadh’s goal of toppling the Damascus regime, experts say.

Riyadh, as is usual, did not elaborate on its statement this week that Prince Bandar bin Sultan was being replaced, saying only that the veteran diplomat had asked to step down.

But a Saudi expert said that Washington — irritated for some time by Prince Bandar’s handling of the Syria dossier — had in December demanded his removal. Prince Bandar was leading Saudi Arabia’s efforts to finance, arm and unify the Syrian rebellion, which after three years of fighting is still far from its goal of overthrowing the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

The spy chief’s efforts were especially stymied by US objections to plans to supply the rebels with advanced weapons that could tip the military balance against Assad’s forces, which are increasingly gaining the upper hand on the ground.

Dubbed “Bandar Bush” for his strong links with former US president George Bush and his son George w Bush — forged during the time he served as ambassador to Washington — the Saudi royal has openly criticised the current US administration headed by the Democrats.

He vented his anger in front of Western diplomats when Washington stepped back after threatening a military strike following deadly chemical attacks in August outside Damascus that the West blamed on Assad forces. One diplomat revealed that Prince Bandar had on that occasion angrily said Riyadh no longer considered the United States to be its principal ally and that it would instead be seeking support from France and other powers.

The influential powerbroker was appointed intelligence chief in 2012.

His last public assignment was a failed attempt in December to press Russian President Vladimir Putin to abandon his support for Assad.

Experts underlined Prince Bandar’s encouragement to Islamists in Syria, which they said increased security threats already posed to the kingdom by Saudi Jihadists. “Prince Bandar’s aggressive Syria approach highlighted the gap between the expectations he set and Saudi Arabia’s intelligence and operational capabilities,” said Emile Hokayem, senior fellow for regional security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

“Running a vast and complex effort to help bring down a foreign regime supported by Iran and Russia was simply beyond Riyadh’s ability,” he said. Saudi Arabia’s goal is especially difficult due to the “reluctance of its main Western partner and the conflicting agendas of other important regional players such as Turkey and Qatar,” he added.

Although the Arab heavyweight has supplied the rebels with “arms and rebels,” Hokayem said, it had to deal with armed groups that are “dangerous and undisciplined”. The Damascus government, on the other hand, enjoys strong support from Iran, which “could count on organised and well-trained proxies and allies,” such as Lebanon’s Hizbullah movement, he added.

Diplomats indicated in February that the kingdom had sidelined Prince Bandar from the Syrian dossier, assigning it to Interior Minister Prince Mohamed bin Nayef, known as the kingdom’s iron fist in the fight against al-Qaeda. Soon afterwards Riyadh announced tougher punishment for Saudi Islamists fighting abroad, warning that they could spend 20 years behind bars.

“The ballooning number of Saudi Jihadists in Syria — with probable negative consequences for the Saudi regime — and the setbacks suffered there contributed to a rethinking and consequently a reshuffling in Riyadh,” argues Hokayem.

Saudi analysts insist however that replacing Prince Bandar does not mean a shift in the Saudi position towards the Syrian conflict.

“There is no change. Saudi Arabia wants the fall of Bashar al-Assad,” stressed columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

“There is no such thing as the politics of Bandar. There is government policy as well as directives given by King Abdullah that any intelligence chief would implement,” he said.

For the time being Prince Bandar’s deputy, Yusef al-Idrissi, has been appointed as a caretaker but Saudi sources have said that another member of the royal family is likely to be named to the post.

 

Saudi spy chief ousted under US pressure

The exit of Saudi’s spy chief was the result of US pressure over his stance on Syria but does not signal a shift in Riyadh’s goal of toppling the Damascus regime, experts say.

Riyadh, as is usual, did not elaborate on its statement this week that Prince Bandar bin Sultan was being replaced, saying only that the veteran diplomat had asked to step down.

But a Saudi expert said that Washington — irritated for some time by Prince Bandar’s handling of the Syria dossier — had in December demanded his removal. Prince Bandar was leading Saudi Arabia’s efforts to finance, arm and unify the Syrian rebellion, which after three years of fighting is still far from its goal of overthrowing the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

The spy chief’s efforts were especially stymied by US objections to plans to supply the rebels with advanced weapons that could tip the military balance against Assad’s forces, which are increasingly gaining the upper hand on the ground.

Dubbed “Bandar Bush” for his strong links with former US president George Bush and his son George w Bush — forged during the time he served as ambassador to Washington — the Saudi royal has openly criticised the current US administration headed by the Democrats.

He vented his anger in front of Western diplomats when Washington stepped back after threatening a military strike following deadly chemical attacks in August outside Damascus that the West blamed on Assad forces. One diplomat revealed that Prince Bandar had on that occasion angrily said Riyadh no longer considered the United States to be its principal ally and that it would instead be seeking support from France and other powers.

The influential powerbroker was appointed intelligence chief in 2012.

His last public assignment was a failed attempt in December to press Russian President Vladimir Putin to abandon his support for Assad.

Experts underlined Prince Bandar’s encouragement to Islamists in Syria, which they said increased security threats already posed to the kingdom by Saudi Jihadists. “Prince Bandar’s aggressive Syria approach highlighted the gap between the expectations he set and Saudi Arabia’s intelligence and operational capabilities,” said Emile Hokayem, senior fellow for regional security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

“Running a vast and complex effort to help bring down a foreign regime supported by Iran and Russia was simply beyond Riyadh’s ability,” he said. Saudi Arabia’s goal is especially difficult due to the “reluctance of its main Western partner and the conflicting agendas of other important regional players such as Turkey and Qatar,” he added.

Although the Arab heavyweight has supplied the rebels with “arms and rebels,” Hokayem said, it had to deal with armed groups that are “dangerous and undisciplined”. The Damascus government, on the other hand, enjoys strong support from Iran, which “could count on organised and well-trained proxies and allies,” such as Lebanon’s Hizbullah movement, he added.

Diplomats indicated in February that the kingdom had sidelined Prince Bandar from the Syrian dossier, assigning it to Interior Minister Prince Mohamed bin Nayef, known as the kingdom’s iron fist in the fight against al-Qaeda. Soon afterwards Riyadh announced tougher punishment for Saudi Islamists fighting abroad, warning that they could spend 20 years behind bars.

“The ballooning number of Saudi Jihadists in Syria — with probable negative consequences for the Saudi regime — and the setbacks suffered there contributed to a rethinking and consequently a reshuffling in Riyadh,” argues Hokayem.

Saudi analysts insist however that replacing Prince Bandar does not mean a shift in the Saudi position towards the Syrian conflict.

“There is no change. Saudi Arabia wants the fall of Bashar al-Assad,” stressed columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

“There is no such thing as the politics of Bandar. There is government policy as well as directives given by King Abdullah that any intelligence chief would implement,” he said.

For the time being Prince Bandar’s deputy, Yusef al-Idrissi, has been appointed as a caretaker but Saudi sources have said that another member of the royal family is likely to be named to the post.

 

[